LOGIN DASHBOARD

    News Analysis

    6 MIN READ

    Six years since promulgation, problems remain with the constitution

    Prasansha Rimal, September 19, 2021, Kathmandu

    Six years since promulgation, problems remain with the constitution

      Share this article

    Madhesis, Tharus, Muslims, and women are still unable to take ownership of the statute due to the document’s failure to encompass their aspirations.

    
            President Bidya Bhandari and Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba at an event marking Constitution Day.
    President Bidya Bhandari and Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba at an event marking Constitution Day. (RSS)

    Six years ago, on September 20, 2015, the new Nepali constitution was promulgated by then President Ram Baran Yadav. On one side was an image of Yadav lifting the constitution up to his forehead as a sign of respect but on the other was a trail of dead bodies, approximately 45 according to Human Rights Watch, of both protestors and police killed in violent clashes over the new constitution. 

    The constitution — produced after seven long years and two Constituent Assemblies, in the wake of a 10-year-long civil insurgency — was supposed to encompass the aspirations of all Nepalis. But six years after its promulgation, numerous minority groups still believe that the statute failed to live up to their hopes and desires. 

    “People of the Muslim and Tharu community still haven’t been able to accept the constitution as their own,” said Mohna Ansari, rights activist and former member of the National Human Rights Commission. 

    Ansari stressed that the constitution has largely been used as a tool to fulfill political interests even as citizens still face numerous problems due to lacking citizenship, something that the constitution restricts for women. 

    Numerous protests, especially across the breadth of the Tarai, had erupted before promulgation in 2015, and in the aftermath, India had imposed a crippling blockade. Madhesis, Tharus, Janajatis, and women, who had all expressed their dissatisfaction with the statute, were promised constitutional amendments, but none has materialized so far. 

    Many of the Madhes-based parties, who led the bulk of the protests, continue to mark Ashoj 3, which falls on September 19 this year, as a ‘black day’ even as the country at large celebrates Sambidhan Diwas. But major political actors from the Nepali Congress, CPN-UML, and Maoists continue to champion the constitution as “one of the best in the world”, a nebulous claim that still gets repeated in the mainstream media. 

    “It is a shame that one of the so-called best constitutions is unable to address the problem of women belonging to diverse communities,” said Prakriti Bhattarai Basnet of the organization Political Literacy for Women. “Our constitution has continued to portray women as something to be protected.” 

    When the constitution was promulgated, writer Manjushree Thapa protested by burning a copy. She explained, “The new constitution...endorsed the logic of the Hindu patriarch. Not only can women not confer citizenship to their children independently of men, the children of Nepali women and foreign men will be barred from high office. No such restriction applies to the children of Nepali men married to foreign women. And Nepali men can, as ever, confer citizenship to their children independently of women.”

    READ MORE: Women have no nationality

    The citizenship issue is one that intersects identities — woman and Madhesi. While all women cannot independently and easily pass on citizenship to their children, the restriction was put in place targeting the Madhesi population which shares a close roti-beti relationship with India. While Madhesis had initially demanded a One Madhes, One Pradesh in the Tarai, they had eventually acquiesced to one province that was firmly located in the Tarai and did not include districts from the mid-hills. Province 2 is currently the only district where the Madhes-based Janata Samajbadi Party has a sizable presence. 

    For all its faults, the constitution remains an epochal document, one that legitimizes the transformation of the country from a unitary Hindu monarchy to a federal, secular state. But even those who championed the document when it was first produced have done little to implement its spirit, instead choosing to trample on its safeguards. 

    “It is time to review the constitution,” former chief justice Kalyan Shrestha told Kantipur daily in an interview. “In terms of implementation, there is no reason to be happy. The government and the political community have not done enough to implement it. Rights guaranteed by the constitution should have been implemented by drafting new laws, setting up institutions, determining procedures, and allocating resources. Implementation appears to be a distant thing now, even the culture of abiding by the constitution has not been set up.”  

    Former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli was constantly accused of having shredded the constitution through his actions of dissolving the elected federal Parliament and announcing elections. And even those once on the opposite end from Oli — Madhesi political stalwarts Mahanta Thakur and Rajendra Mahato — joined the former prime minister in government after being promised amendments. That coalition was unceremoniously unseated by the Supreme Court and Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Nepali Congress established as prime minister.

    READ MORE: Oli sacrifices the constitution to save his own skin

    It was under the watch of the Nepali Congress, Nepal’s grand old party, that the 2015 constitution was promulgated and many say that the party bears more responsibility for the implementation of the statute. But Deuba has failed to take any decisive action so far in government, not even being able to expand his Cabinet beyond four members. His coalition partner, the Janata Samajbadi Party of Upendra Yadav, will likely demand constitutional amendments though, as that has been a central issue for the largely Madhes-based party. 

     “There is a problem in the articles of the constitution as well as its implementation,” said Birgunj-based journalist Chandrakishore, who believes that the constitution should have given more authority and power over decision-making to the provinces.

    Much of the failure to implement the constitution comes from the fact that the federal government has long delayed handing over any real semblance of power to the provinces. Dozens of laws that were supposed to be enacted to strengthen and operationalize federalism have yet to be passed by the federal Parliament. The provinces have thus been deliberately undercut of all their power and at the same time, their inability to work effectively is being employed by opponents of federalism as indicative of the failure of federalism as a system itself. 

    The constitution is considered a sacrosanct document that broadly governs the entire nation-state and thus, needs to be a symbol of stability. But at the same time, it must be a flexible document that can evolve along with the needs of its citizens. Any disregard for the demands of diverse communities would be disregarding Article 2 of the very constitution, which vests sovereignty in the Nepali people. Acknowledging the multiple demands for constitutional revision would help promote socio-cultural solidarity by recognizing Nepal’s “multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-religious, multi-cultural” character, as asserted by the preamble of the constitution.



    author bio photo

    Prasansha Rimal  Prasansha Rimal is a law student and a reporting intern at The Record.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    Longreads

    Perspectives

    19 min read

    Secularism is at a crossroads in Nepal

    Krishnaman Rai - June 13, 2022

    Anti-secular voices demanding a return to Nepal’s character as a Hindu state are on the rise but they ignore the larger danger to Hinduism – Hindutva.

    Perspectives

    6 min read

    How Balen Shah, Harka Rai, and Gopi Hamal won their elections

    Jagadish Paudel - May 31, 2022

    Instead of abstract ideas and lofty promises, the independent candidates who won mayoral spots in three Nepali cities all presented issues that were close to the public’s immediate needs.

    Features

    10 min read

    The recent warning to the govt by HRW will probably fall on deaf ears, yet again

    The Record - September 2, 2020

    Even as rights bodies continue to call out the Nepal government for its atrocities and lack of action in human rights cases, it continues with its culture of impunity

    COVID19

    Features

    5 min read

    Vaccine deals for Nepal stuck in limbo

    The Record - September 30, 2020

    The government’s indecision about vaccine imports and trials is going to cost the people dearly

    Perspectives

    10 min read

    Why aren’t more women selected as candidates?

    Seira Tamang - May 16, 2022

    Patriarchy alone is not a sufficient explanation for the lack of women in candidate selection for the recently held local elections.

    Week in Politics

    5 min read

    Censorship online, TJ issues, aid problems, threats

    The Record - January 20, 2020

    The week in politics: what happened, what does it mean, why does it matter?

    Perspectives

    5 min read

    What does it mean to be a casteist?

    Tarun Timalsina - July 8, 2021

    To not be a casteist, we must recognize that caste is structural and exists in invisible forms in Nepali society.

    Photo Essays

    2 min read

    Change of course

    Prasiit Sthapit - October 5, 2019

    The geo-politics of a river.

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy