LOGIN DASHBOARD

    COVID19

    Opinions

    5 MIN READ

    Social distancing or social ostracising

    Rajkishor Rajak, April 10, 2020, Kathmandu

    Social distancing or social ostracising

      Share this article

    Social distancing inadvertently validates the ostracisation entrenched in the history of South Asia

    (The Record)

    Since its appearance in Wuhan, China in December of 2019, the coronavirus outbreak has proliferated in 209 countries and territories, throwing the entire world into a crisis of unprecedented scale. While China has largely contained the virus and is slowly transitioning into a post-corona phase, many countries in the West are still grappling with the way it has exploded among their populace, overwhelming medical infrastructure and devastating economies. In the midst of all of this, the one measure that has been adopted across nations and appears to effectively be flattening the curve is social distancing.

    The idea of social distancing was originally pushed forward by the World Health Organisation and includes the practice of maintaining an at least 6 feet distance from one’s coworkers, neighbours, friends and family, or isolating oneself while avoiding social, religious, political and any other type of gathering. Symptoms of coronavirus can take on average a week to show up, and recent reports show that many cases are actually asymptomatic. Under social distancing, especially during lockdown, people avoid physical proximity with others, which successfully eliminates the possibility of the virus’ spread. Therefore, it would be more apt to call social distancing physical distancing.

    To refer to the physical act of distancing oneself as a ‘social’ action highlights how the measure is possible only under the collective conscience and responsible behaviour of members within a society. This makes it a social rather than a medical intervention. But the very act of naming it social distancing inadvertently associates it with the social ostracisation that is entrenched in the history and politics of South Asia.

    Read also: A virus gives its verdict on Nepali society

    WHO has recognised, albeit somewhat late, its inappropriateness and is now encouraging us to call it ‘physical distancing’ instead. But social distancing, the term, has already gained strong currency within the global psyche and the term has held ground. Worse, the ‘social’ repercussions of the term are manifesting in a different but not unprecedented way; a potentially infected person, especially in South Asia, is now also being stigmatised and ostracised.

    Hinduism, the subcontinent’s dominant religious group comprising over a billion members, is riddled with caste hierarchies and a social order that has deemed the lower caste as the group of untouchables. Untouchability, which calls upon a strict distancing of the Shudras from high caste Hindus and which was banned in India in 1955, nevertheless continues to be a prevalent practice. Caste-based discrimination has barred those falling in the lowest strata of Hinduism’s varna system from availing social welfare, educational or economic opportunities in an equitable fashion for hundreds of years. As the Covid19 pandemic unfolds in this region, the system’s workings are now open for the world to see.

    Read also: Untouchable stories of touchable vaginas

    A day after Nepal enforced its lockdown, prime minister Narendra Modi also announced a complete shutdown to be abided by India’s 1.3 billion population. On 19 March, Modi had already tested people’s willingness to be under lockdown by requesting a ‘janta curfew’ which was celebrated with a very public clanging and banging of pots and thaalis. The privileged had given their verdict; they approved. On the midnight of 24 March, when the lockdown took effect, they acquiesced obediently, quarantined themselves in their homes and waited for the three weeks to get over.

    Meanwhile, a large number of migrant workers in cities like Mumbai and Delhi found that they were suddenly jobless, wageless and homeless. In desperation, many began a long walk back home. But they weren’t allowed to traverse in peace. Apart from police brutality, they were called names and stigmatised, their march back home amid the lockdown criminalised. At least 22 workers died in less than a week. The dehumanisation reached its pinnacle when authorities disinfected a group of migrant workers as they were forced to squat on the street.

    Nepali migrant workers, many of whom were part of the trail of those fleeing Indian cities, landed at points along the Nepal border, only to find that their own country would not let them in. In the midst of physical, social and psychological trauma, many have tried to cross over to Nepal by swimming across the Mahakali River, only to be greeted by police’s handcuffs.

    Watch now: Stateless at Border due to COVID19 lockdown

    In Nepal, the lockdown became an incompetent government’s sweeping but fraught gesture to combat the pandemic. Criminalising its own citizens and violating their constitutional right to enter their own country became another short-cut. An emergency law that took effect did more for the government’s self-preservation than for the wellbeing of its most marginalised citizens. The downtrodden migrant workers became the enemies, frontline health professionals vulnerable to the virus began to be seen with suspicion, and those voluntarily self-isolating have been treated with derision.

    On 29 March, on his monthly radio programme, Modi talked about ways to fight the pandemic, his rhetoric fueled by Hindu religious metaphors. He urged Indians to follow the “lakshman rekha” instead of asking them to ‘self-quarantine’, all the while ignoring the fact that many of the most vulnerable in his country cannot afford to do so. Under a plea for “unity”, Modi in fact validated and valorised class and caste divisions. In mock humility, as he apologised to his janta, he furthered the idea that abiding by the rules of the lockdown was a way for them to show love and compassion to their compatriots.

    But a group’s ability to show sympathy to an ‘other’ reverberates with unequal power relations, and runs against the notions of liberty, equality and fraternity envisioned by the Indian constitution. Such feel-good sympathy ironically preserves and perpetuates age-old practices of social distancing and ostracisation that have been especially prevalent in places like India and Nepal.

    ::::::

     



    author bio photo

    Rajkishor Rajak  Rajkishor Rajak is an Ambedkarite social activist and human rights based development professional. For the past 14 years, he has been associated with Bahujan movement which is working to annihilate caste, patriarchy, gender based hegemony, advocating for social democracy through democratization of existing social system. He is a regular op-ed contributor to different national print media. He mostly writes about social discrimination and advocates for social justice. He has completed his post-graduate study in gender and feminist study.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    Features

    5 min read

    Breaking the fever with Gauley Bhai’s Joro

    Pranaya Sjb Rana - May 17, 2021

    Take a break from the gloom and doom of the pandemic and give Gauley Bhai’s infectious, energetic debut album a listen.

    Perspectives

    6 min read

    Where does Nepal stand in global cyberspace

    Rajiv Prajapati - December 10, 2021

    In the modern world, the digital realm is all-pervasive and all-powerful. For Nepal, being left behind means being defenseless to the realm’s insidious influences

    COVID19

    8 min read

    Kathmandu Valley goes into lockdown from Thursday, buying some precious time to prepare

    Aishwarya Baidar , Ishita Shahi - April 26, 2021

    As most Covid-designated beds are already occupied, the authorities will have to ensure that the health care system is prepared to deal with the second wave.

    COVID19

    7 min read

    Sound the alarm

    Ishita Shahi , Aishwarya Baidar - April 22, 2021

    The second wave is here and unless the government acts soon, Nepal will be in the midst of a public health disaster

    Perspectives

    9 min read

    Beneath our rock bottoms

    Nischal Niraula - December 29, 2021

    Reflections on one’s lowest to see what lessons can be learnt by the self and society.

    COVID19

    News

    3 min read

    Daily Covid19 Roundup, 2 April: A new Covid19 case, rage over DPM’s rash remarks, & testing starts outside capital

    The Record - April 2, 2020

    A daily summary of all Covid19 related developments that matter

    Features

    5 min read

    Paternalistic and parochial: women decry new immigration rules

    Dewan Rai - February 10, 2021

    Proposed new rules will make it mandatory for women travellers to obtain permission from their families and the local government.

    COVID19

    Perspectives

    7 min read

    Treated as family but worked like slaves

    Sandhya Sitoula , Kripa Basnyat - June 21, 2021

    In Nepal, and other parts of the world, domestic workers are routinely denied social and labor protection, and with Covid-19, their problems have only gotten worse.

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy