LOGIN DASHBOARD

    Explainers

    4 MIN READ

    What the indictment of two officials means for reforms within Nepal Army

    The Record, May 27, 2020, Kathmandu

    What the indictment of two officials means for reforms within Nepal Army

      Share this article

    Despite showing positive signs, the army needs to come under CIAA’s jurisdiction to gain more credibility

    (The Record)

    In a rare case, the Nepal Army has taken two of its top officials into custody for allegedly being involved in corruption within the institution. The officials–Brigadier General of Army Welfare Directorate Prayog Jung Rana and Colonel Nabin Silwal–were taken to the army’s detention centre on May 21 after being charged for being involved in the financial irregularities found at the United Nations accredited Birendra Peace Operations Training Centre in Kavre.

    Both officials had been working at the centre before being appointed to oversee the Army’s Welfare Fund at the headquarters. Rana has been accused of corruption while leading the centre and Silwal, who worked as his junior, is being investigated as an accomplice. A day earlier, three army officials–including Bhupalman Adhikari, chief of Bhaktapur’s Sainik Awasiya Mahabidhyalaya–had also been accused of being involved in corruption. The military court has demanded the retrieval of NRP 18.5 million from Adhikari. But such repercussions are an exception rather than a norm within the army.

    The Nepal Army, which has been mandated to safeguard national sovereignty and handle major disasters, has of late been accused of prioritising profit-making ventures. Its stakes in the business and development sectors within Nepal have risen considerably over the past decade. Currently, it has more business interests than any Nepali business firm. This signals a changing role in the function and identity of the army. However, its position within the state structure, especially vis-a-vis the judiciary and anti-graft bodies like the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA), has remained the same. So even as corruption cases involving top army officials have increased in recent years, the manner in which they are dealt with remains beyond the purview of the judiciary as well as the public. In the most recent case, the army headquarters has not divulged the intensity of corruption involving its two senior officials, nor has it officially stated the nature of the financial irregularities they are charged with. 

    One of the major sources of profit for the army comes from the investments it has made using the Army Welfare Fund. Established 55 years ago, the fund was built using levy collected from UN peacekeeping returnees, and was meant to be used to offer benefits to officials. A staggering NPR 44 billion from the fund has been invested in profit-making ventures that range from petrol pumps to real estate, health to educational institutions, and many types of industries. The nature of such transactions and investments is not clear. And discrepancy in the manner of distribution of profits has been noted. While higher ranking officials have made millions, profits have not been returned to the welfare fund, or distributed equitably with lower ranking officials who make up the majority, and whose modest salaries make maintaining basic living standards a perpetual struggle.

    Read also: An Open Letter to the Chief of Nepal Army

    The army’s annual budget has also been increasing every year. In the past decade, it has increased three-fold; whereas in the 2009-10 fiscal year, NRP 18 billion was allocated for the army, by the 2019-20 fiscal year, it had spiked to NRP 50 billion. This year alone, the Nepal Army has bagged development contracts worth NRP 19 billion. After failing to handle major development projects, the government has been awarding such projects to the army. Projects which would otherwise be under the jurisdiction of the CIAA now are beyond its reach, making it that much easier for army officials to misuse state coffers without having to face consequences. Even when complaints against army personnel are registered at oversight agencies such as the parliament’s anti-corruption agency, they cannot take up such issues due to legal hindrances. 

    Last February, a task force under the parliamentary State Affairs Committee sought the help of the CIAA to investigate corruption complaints linked to the former army chief Rajendra Chhetri. Appointed as head of the army in September 2015, Chhetri remained in office for three years. He was accused of misusing state funds in the process of building the army headquarters and accumulating large amounts of property during his tenure. The case, however, could not be taken by CIAA due to lack of legal clarity; the army falls beyond the CIAA’s jurisdiction.

    While nearly all chiefs of the Nepal Police have been booked for corruption charges, legal immunity has allowed army generals to avoid legal prosecution, even while the police have a smaller budget and refrain from development-related contracts.

    Read also: The changing faces of the Nepal Army

    Since Purna Chandra Thapa’s appointment as the chief in September, 2018, the Nepal Army has shown signs of reform. Thapa began his tenure by publicising his own property details. Then he took action against officials involved in alleged bribery cases. He also saw to the establishment of an oversight cell to investigate irregularities, with cases that are deemed probe-worthy being expedited through a court of inquiry. 

    While these measures signal reform, it is unclear how this is impacting corruption within the army. Lack of transparency, and the army’s unwillingness to make public the charges levelled against the accused, throws into question how genuine this reform is. The credibility of internal probes and actions continue to be questioned within the institution and beyond. If the army is to change its image in the eyes of the public, it must open itself up to the jurisdiction of anti-corruption bodies such as the CIAA.

    :::::::::



    author bio photo

    The Record  We are an independent digital publication based in Kathmandu, Nepal. Our stories examine politics, the economy, society, and culture. We look into events both current and past, offering depth, analysis, and perspective. Explore our features, explainers, long reads, multimedia stories, and podcasts. There’s something here for everyone.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    Features

    12 min read

    The Migration Stories

    Sophia L. Pandé - March 24, 2020

    Kesang Tseten, in documenting these grueling stories, has done his part by successfully bringing the experience of the Nepali migrant worker to our attention, and has thus recorded history in unforgettable images.

    Explainers

    6 min read

    Nepali reality in the gig economy

    Saurabh Shah - March 15, 2018

    Risks and benefits of virtual platform work

    Features

    5 min read

    The queer community demand right representation in the new census

    Aishwarya Baidar , Ishita Shahi - May 21, 2021

    Clumping together gender identity and sexual orientation into one category in the census is misrepresentative say some members of the queer community, but there are others who see it as an opportunity

    Opinions

    4 min read

    Five questions for CM Lalbabu Raut

    Kalpana Jha - November 18, 2020

    To help prevent incidences of rape, Nepali society and law must tackle cultural norms that apportion entitlement and agency differently to men and women

    COVID19

    News

    5 min read

    Covid19 Roundup, 7 May: Arrival of fresh kits brings hopes of more tests

    The Record - May 7, 2020

    A daily summary of all Covid19 related developments that matter

    COVID19

    Features

    2 min read

    Domestic flights resume despite apparent risks

    The Record - September 21, 2020

    The need for travel, connectivity, and revival of the economy has overwhelmed the need for safety

    Explainers

    7 min read

    Understanding the Tharu perspective on the 2015 Tikapur incident 

    Prasansha Rimal - September 2, 2021

    Six years since Tikapur, Tharus have been demanding that the incident be treated on par with other violent protests — as a political movement rather than a criminal act.

    Features

    8 min read

    Enabling impunity

    Dewan Rai , Bhadra Sharma - July 31, 2020

    Politicians have mastered the art of exploiting the nexus between themselves and prosecutors to always remain beyond the arm of the law

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy