LOGIN DASHBOARD

    Perspectives

    6 MIN READ

    Alternative justice in Dolpo

    Nyima Gyaltsen Gurung, April 12, 2022, Dolpo

    Alternative justice in Dolpo

      Share this article

    Despite the presence of newly mandated judicial committees, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms continue to take precedence among Dolpa’s ingenious community. 

    
            Saldang village in Dolpa's Nankhang Valley
    Saldang village in Dolpa's Nankhang Valley

    In the fall of 2018, I received a note asking me to appear at my late grandfather's home in Dolpo with a pen in hand. I arrived to find my father’s siblings, along with three other individuals. I realized that the three gentlemen were about to partition the ancestral property and I had been appointed as a neutral party to prepare the inventory under their direction. 

    I had been involved in a similar situation earlier, in 2017, when a woman had sought me out to settle a domestic disturbance. In both these cases, an alternative to the formal justice process was sought. Unlike the court system, which necessitates that those involved seek remedy from the district court, many indigenous communities tend to resolve disputes without requiring the parties to invest large amounts of time and effort. 

    Indigenous communities in Nepal have been practicing their own form of arbitration and mediation, often called arb-med, since ancient times. These forms of alternative mediation have taken the form of Tumyang in the Kirat period, Panchali in Lichchhavi, and Panchayat in the Malla period. However, many forms continue today as the Mukhiya system in Mustang, Tamudi in Gurung, Khadayanji in Sherpa, Badhghar in Tharu, Sheer Uthaune in Rai, Adaalat in Kisaan, and Guthi Sabha in the Newa community. 

    Alternative dispute resolution processes have also long been practiced in Dolpo. Locals in Dolpo, although aware of the formal justice system, are reluctant to file cases in court, often due to the geographical distance and the cost and time involved. A history of neglect and exclusion by the Nepali state has also led to locals not considering the courts as a space to seek justice. 

    Primarily guided by a religious ethos, locals see filing a lawsuit as a last resort. Dolpo society is non-litigious and the courts become a necessary evil only when all local remedies have been exhausted. However, recent inter-municipal lawsuits suggest that Dolpo people too have now started to see the courts as a forum for justice, in addition to their own traditional dispute resolution mechanisms. 

    In Dolpo, the final decision for the settlement of disputes formally rested with the spyi khab (Tib. སྤྱི་ཁྱབ་), or village head. As a general procedure, the aggrieved party first approaches the dpon po (Tib. དཔོན་པོ་) or sku drag (Tib. སྐུ་དྲག་) with a scarf and some goods or a little cash. The dpon po and sku drag were previously called spyi khab. The dpon po hears both sides of the story and settles the dispute by giving a decision. If the situation requires it, a chad pa (Tib. ཆད་པ་), i.e. fine, is imposed on the defaulting party. In the past, spyi khyabs would also inflict corporal punishment, sometimes extending to rigorous whipping until disfigured. 

    Alternatively, a third party can be invited by the aggrieved party to help resolve the dispute, much like the itinerary judges in medieval England after the Norman conquest, or in the Nepali context, Chharidar in the Malla period. The neutral party can be the village head, but also those having sufficient ground for impartiality. Essentially, elderly people are generally selected as neutral parties. Anyone who has a previous record of successfully resolving disputes will likely be called to settle more disputes in the future. 

    A majority of civil cases, including family and matrimonial issues, in Dolpo are settled with the help of a third party, which could either be the dpon po or another trusted member of society. Even criminal cases, like physical assault, theft, and sexual offenses, are sometimes settled through dispute resolution. Things can get complicated, however, when such local authorities decide on such serious criminal cases as the aggrieved party can choose to disregard the local verdict and go to a formal court of law. Complications arise when the decision of state-appointed authorities contradicts the decision of the local dispute resolution mechanism. 

    However, the new judicial committee, mandated by the Local Government Operation Act 2017, threatens to disrupt this indigenous method of dispute settlement. The local Judicial Committee, led by the vice-chairperson of the local body, has the jurisdiction to resolve 11 types of disputes using mediation and 13 through adversarial mechanisms. Yet, so far, the choice of locals seems to have remained with local methods and failing that, the courts, rather than the Judicial Committee. Locals say that judicial committees are often unaware of the roles they are required to play and are generally staffed by individuals from non-legal backgrounds without any specific training. 

    There are numerous issues with the judicial committees. First, whatever disputes the committee facilitates ultimately end up in the court, as an appeal can be filed against its decision. Secondly, disputants might not want to hand decisive authority over to a stranger if they have the option of getting things settled by someone they know and trust, like a village elder. Furthermore, the judicial committee adopts a ‘one size fits all’ approach that does not take into account the diversity of Nepal’s communities and their varying ways of ensuring justice. 

    In this context, traditional dispute resolution remains the mechanism of choice for the people of Dolpo. This indigenous method is best described as a combination of arbitration and mediation, where the spyi khyab or dpon po controls both the procedure and outcome of dispute settlement. Dolpo's traditional method, however, clashes with the Mediation Act 2012, since it does not require the selection of judges by mutual consent or the preparation of a mediation document. Yet, as these methods continue to persist and are employed by a wide range of indigenous communities, they can be incorporated into national legislation with amendments to existing alternative dispute resolution laws. 

    While such dispute resolution methods come with their own challenges of confidentiality, impartiality, respect, and integrity, they do provide an alternative to the costly and time-consuming results of traditional court procedures. And in areas like Dolpo, where the presence of the state remains weak, such mechanisms will continue to flourish.



    author bio photo

    Nyima Gyaltsen Gurung  Nyima Gyaltsen Gurung is a law student at TU and is from Dolpo in upper Dolpa.



    Comments

    Get the best of

    the Record

    Previous Next

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

    COVID19

    Photo Essays

    7 min read

    A death in three acts

    Kishor Maharjan - February 1, 2021

    When Nur Bahadur Thapa died of an accident in Riyadh, his body was repatriated by his friend, driven

    News

    3 min read

    No pay, no food for many Nepalis in Qatar

    The Record - June 11, 2020

    A recently released AI report shows how Qatar is still mistreating migrant workers from countries like Nepal

    COVID19

    News

    4 min read

    Covid19 Roundup, 12 April: Covid cases reach 12, WB predicts economic crisis, leaders call to let migrants in

    The Record - April 12, 2020

    A daily summary of Covid19 related developments that matter

    Features

    Photo Essays

    6 min read

    Valley slums face torrential problems

    Aishwarya Baidar - July 9, 2021

    Abandoned by the government and harassed by the monsoon rains, slum dwellers lack shelter when they need it most.

    COVID19

    News

    3 min read

    Daily Covid19 Roundup, 1 April: Deal for Covid19 supplies annulled, border crisis reaches SC & foreign tourists return home

    The Record - April 1, 2020

    A daily summary of all Covid19 related developments that matter.

    Explainers

    3 min read

    Nepal’s quest for legalising cannabis

    The Record - March 5, 2020

    New legislation seeks to end the existing blanket ban on the sale, cultivation and production of marijuana. It would also partially lift restrictions on the use of the weed for medicinal purposes.

    COVID19

    News

    2 min read

    Covid19 Roundup, 10 April: 630 tests in a day, Oli-Modi talk, courts closed and TU exams deferred

    The Record - April 10, 2020

    A daily summary of all Covid19 related developments that matter

    Opinions

    8 min read

    The long and arduous journey to winning a Supreme Court case as a same-sex married couple

    Suman Pant - March 31, 2019

    The story of how one couple navigated the Nepali bureaucracy to pursue recognition

    • About
    • Contributors
    • Jobs
    • Contact

    CONNECT WITH US

    © Copyright the Record | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy